Preview for the E-Debate of the Century

E-books, eloads, and the OECD have garnered conflicted stats in their mainstream depiction. You might remember the story of the famous e-book writer who jockeyed to fame on the basis of her latent text about vampires. Then, there's the Simon Owens piece of 2011 that initially brandished the success of that industry based on the viability of one Stephen King publication before moving along to more onerous details. Owens graphed the success of the e-book industry in relation to one survey on Riding the Bullet, a Stephen King text. Owens suggested that the $2.50 purchase of the King novel ended up jamming the server space of one organization that vetted the novel in electronic sales. He and other industry giants predicted that the "'revolution has well and truly begun.'" For those of you who have been out of the debate between electronic and print copies for the past five years, I will outline the surfeited economic justification for the electronic print industry as well as a prediction of how, though omnipresent in the publishing industry, the true theory behind literary publications remains untouched from the perspective of the thinker, the writer, and information processing worker.

My opinion to be published within 1-2 business days.